Local: 601-607-3456
Toll Free: 800-459-2222
208 Waterford Square, Suite 300
Madison, MS 39110-6857
Can You Sue a Dog Owner After a Dog Bite in Mississippi?

Can You Sue a Dog Owner After a Dog Bite in Mississippi?

Dogs can be unpredictable. Even when an owner thinks that his or her dog is a “friendly” dog, it can still attack and bite a stranger. The chance of biting and seriously biting a small child or baby is even more likely. The question is whether anyone can sue the dog owner if they are injured by the dog. The answer is yes and no. Yes. The dog attack victim can sue the dog owner under certain conditions in Mississippi. There is no specific statute in Mississippi as there is in other states that makes a specific ruleing on dog bites or dog attacks. Dog attacks come under more general rules of negligence. If the victim and his or her attorney can prove that the dog owner was negligent in some way, then a lawsuit may be successful. Negligence may be proved in a number of different situations. The dog was released from its leash or allowed to run free in a public area where dogs were either forbidden or at least required to be on a leash. The dog was known by the owner to have previous dangerous tendencies. This might include the fact that the dog had already attacked or bitten other people before the incident under question. It might be because the dog was of a particular breed that had a known record of being dangerous, e.g. a pit bull terrier or mastiff. Mississippi’s legal stance on dog attacks or dog bites is sometimes referred to as the “one bite” rule, even though there is no statute in Mississippi that actually has that name or description....
Why Not Make Side Guard Rails Mandatory on Tractor Trailers?

Why Not Make Side Guard Rails Mandatory on Tractor Trailers?

Underride accidents are some of the most horrific on our roads. They happen when a smaller vehicle, particularly a sedan, collides with the rear or side of a large truck and gets stuck underneath it. The force of the collision can cause colossal damage to the vehicle, and cause fatalities and serious injuries to the occupants. One of the consequences of an underride collision is that the roof of the car could be peeled off like a sardine can lid, exposing the heads and bodies of the occupants to whatever is under the vehicle. The impact of the collision is often enough to cause serious injuries in any case. The truck driver whose vehicle has been underridden may not even notice that something has happened and the car can be dragged involuntarily down the road for hundreds of yards, compounding the injuries. The danger of underride accidents is greater at night, especially if the truck is in a dimly lit area, close to or crossing an intersection, entering or exiting a side turning or has faulty lights at the rear or is not fitted with lights on the side. It can be particularly hard to judge the size and shape of a dimly lit or unlit tractor-trailer and that’s when vehicles can more easily crash into the back of a large truck or slide under the truck between the axles at the side. Federal law now makes it compulsory for large trucks to have rear underride protection in the form of a guard rail. However, the laws don’t extend to side guard rails. Evidence exists which suggests that where...
Is Talcum Powder Dangerous?

Is Talcum Powder Dangerous?

If you have been using talcum powder or talc regularly for several years you should be aware that there have been numerous concerns raised about the possible link between the use of the powder and some cancers. The link is tenuous but is strongest between the regular use of talcum powder and ovarian cancer in women, especially if the powder has been used in the genital area. The link has led to numerous lawsuits against one of the most important manufacturers of talcum powder, Johnson & Johnson. Some of these lawsuits have been successful, while some have not. There are many thousands of lawsuits still waiting to be heard, some of which have been grouped into a single multiple litigation and are now going to be heard by a federal court. The case against talc Talc is a naturally occurring substance that is composed of a compound containing magnesium, silicon and oxygen. It has been used in powder form for at least a century and probably a lot longer as a drying agent. It is one of the softest of any known minerals, hence its value as a cosmetic. Most commercial talcum powder, such as Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, has been perfumed. It remains a popular cosmetic product but it does seem that the use of it is declining, probably because of negative publicity about its use. Johnson & Johnson, despite the number of lawsuits it has had to contend with, has been adamant that its product is entirely safe. The most convincing evidence was discovered in the 1970s, which was the discovery of talc in ovarian cancer...

Who is affected by the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal?

Widespread vehicle recalls are usually the result of manufacturer’s defects that pose a safety hazard to drivers and their passengers. In recent years, consumers have witnessed large carmakers, like Toyota and GM, issue massive recalls for safety-related issues. For Toyota, it was the result of unintended acceleration in approximately 9 million of their vehicles. For GM, it was an ignition switch defect that was linked to more than a hundred deaths. In September of 2015, Volkswagen (VW) became the most recent automobile manufacturer to make headlines in anticipation of recalling millions of vehicles worldwide. What sets VW apart from the others, however, is the reason for the recall. Where the other manufacturers overlooked known safety hazards, VW is thought to have purposely installed software on millions of their vehicles with an aim at intentionally deceiving consumers and federal regulators. The Volkswagen Defeat Device The software in question has been dubbed the “defeat device.” Its purpose was to boost emissions ratings on VW’s diesel engine vehicles. This sophisticated software could detect when the car was being operated under testing conditions. If the so-called defeat device detected any kind of controlled emissions testing, it would go into a safety mode of sorts that decreased the engine’s performance and overall power. This made the diesel engines’ emissions readout much lower than what it actually was. In fact, when the vehicles in question were driven and tested in real world situations, true emissions results were as much as 40 times that of the legal limit in the United States. Conflicting Emissions Data A European agency was the first to notice discrepancies in VW...

Avandia Sales Slumped on Heart Risks: Adverse Events

On April 25th, 2012, Reuters reported that Avandia sales are collapsing as the drug has been linked to heart risks. Avandia, a popular drug manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, was first approved by the FDA in 1999 to treat Type 2 diabetes in adult patients. GlaxoSmithKline’s first-quarter 2012 sales on the metabolic sector are down 60 percent to £33 million, as Avandia (rosiglitazone) product sales slumped following virtual market removal of the diabetes treatment on safety issues. Several lawsuits have been filed on Avandia side effects. According to court documents, on September 7th, 2011, two plaintiffs, LeMario Holton of Illinois and Rita Catherine Rieger of Delaware, filed a lawsuit in St. Clair County (case no. 11-L-501) alleging they suffered heart attacks and congestive heart failure from their ingestion of Avandia to treat Type 2 diabetes. Plaintiffs claim that they had already begun taking Avandia before warnings of the potential increased risk of heart failure and myocardial ischemia were added to the label in 2007. In May 2007, the New England Journal of Medicine published an independent review of the 2005 clinical data revealing an increase of 43 percent in the risk of heart attacks and an increase of over 60 percent in the risk of cardiovascular death associated with the use of Avandia. AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, can provide helpful advice and simple solutions including how to get in contact with legal counsel so that, in case of Avandia severe adverse events, someone can easily and inexpensively deal with it. As Mr. Burke, director of media relations for AttorneyOne.com, added, “What all this information really illustrates is that threat...

NOAA Scientists Still Studying Mississippi Dolphins

Researchers with NOAA are wrapping up a two-year study of dolphins in the Mississippi Sound. They’re looking for any health problems that may be linked to the BP oil spill. During a boat trip on Wednesday, the first dolphin is spotted in the East Pascagoula River. Photographs of the dorsal fin give scientists a “fingerprint”. “By looking at those carefully, you can uniquely identify the animal. And that pattern will change over time. But if you’re doing a long term study, you can usually keep up with how it’s changing,” said Dr. Keith Mullin, a marine mammal researcher with NOAA. Dolphins feeding in the shadow of Ingalls shipyard provide another photo ID opportunity. Two years after the oil spill many questions remain about how the oil spill affected the health of dolphins in the Mississippi Sound. “This is a very big eco-system that was potentially affected by the oil. And it will take time to get to the bottom of the damage that was done,” said Tim Zink, who works in communications for NOAA. NOAA has released the preliminary findings from a study of dolphins in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, an area which was heavily oiled by the Deepwater Horizon. Researchers there said the results are alarming. “We’ve had some of our researchers indicate they’re the sickest dolphins they’ve ever studied,” said Zink. Those Louisiana dolphins were underweight, anemic and had compromised adrenal glands; symptoms consistent with oil exposure. The NRDA process will determine how many dolphin deaths may be linked to the BP spill. “It’s not like you can go down to Walmart and buy a new dolphin to...